Using the standard growth potential (GP) equation allows direct comparisons from site to site
I used to tell people that GP is just a number, and if they wanted to modify it to fit the way grass grows at their location, then go ahead and do so. I don't say that anymore. Instead, I recommend using the standard equation. Why? To facilitate direct comparisons between sites, knowing that everyone has used the same equation.
I discussed this blog post: https://www.asianturfgrass.com/post/regarding-gp-and-adjustments/
PACE Turf's updated listing of turf diagnostic labs is available at: https://www.paceturf.org/public/turf_diagnostic_labs
Read more about OM246 tests at: https://www.asianturfgrass.com/project/om246/
I discussed this blog post: https://www.asianturfgrass.com/post/regarding-gp-and-adjustments/
PACE Turf's updated listing of turf diagnostic labs is available at: https://www.paceturf.org/public/turf_diagnostic_labs
Read more about OM246 tests at: https://www.asianturfgrass.com/project/om246/
- Read more about all kinds of turfgrass topics at https://www.asianturfgrass.com/
- Find turfgrass information and decision-making tools at https://www.paceturf.org/
- See the PACE Turf YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/paceturf
- See the ATC newsletters at https://subscribepage.com/atc_newsletters
- Listen to the ATC Doublecut with Micah Woods podcast at https://atc-doublecut.transistor.fm/
- Listen to the ATC Office Hours podcast at https://atc-office-hours.transistor.fm/
Creators and Guests
Host
Micah Woods
I'm chief scientist at the Asian Turfgrass Center and director of the @paceturf information service. Some current projects include #OM246, #ClipVol, and #MLSN.
