Using the standard growth potential (GP) equation allows direct comparisons from site to site

I used to tell people that GP is just a number, and if they wanted to modify it to fit the way grass grows at their location, then go ahead and do so. I don't say that anymore. Instead, I recommend using the standard equation. Why? To facilitate direct comparisons between sites, knowing that everyone has used the same equation.

I discussed this blog post: https://www.asianturfgrass.com/post/regarding-gp-and-adjustments/

PACE Turf's updated listing of turf diagnostic labs is available at: https://www.paceturf.org/public/turf_diagnostic_labs

Read more about OM246 tests at: https://www.asianturfgrass.com/project/om246/


Subscribe to my new podcast, Turf Without Borders, at https://turfwb.asianturfgrass.com/subscribe

Register for the Canadian Golf Course Management Conference in Niagara Falls at https://ogsa.ca/golfsupers-2025thecanadian/
If you'd like to attend the 15th International Turfgrass Research Conference in Japan, here's a direct link to the conference website: https://itrc2025.turfsociety.com/

Creators and Guests

Micah Woods
Host
Micah Woods
I'm chief scientist at the Asian Turfgrass Center and director of the @paceturf information service. Some current projects include #OM246, #ClipVol, and #MLSN.
Using the standard growth potential (GP) equation allows direct comparisons from site to site
Broadcast by